Homélies de Dom Armand Veilleux

7 mars 2026 – samedi de la 2e sem. de Carême

Mi 7, 14-15.18-20; Lc 15,1-3. 11-32

H O M É L I E

     Jésus se trouve pris, une fois de plus, entre deux groupes de personnes. D'une part il y a les publicains et les pécheurs qui viennent l'écouter et dont le cœur est souvent touché par son attitude tout autant que par ses paroles; et d'autre part, il y a les pharisiens et les scribes, qui n'approuvent pas du tout son attitude. Ils l'accusent non seulement de faire bon accueil aux mécréants mais même de manger avec eux.


     La parabole que Jésus leur propose alors comporte trois personnages principaux: "Un homme avait deux fils". Le personnage central n'est pas le fils mineur, celui qu'on appelle souvent l'enfant prodigue, bien qu'il ne s'agisse aucunement d'un "enfant". C'est plutôt le père. Le fils mineur, qui demande sa part d'héritage et qui va la gaspiller, représente les publicains et les pécheurs qui viennent écouter Jésus, avec qui il mange, et qui souvent se convertissent à son contact. Le fils aîné, qui refuse de participer à la joie du père et de se mettre à table avec son frère pécheur, représente les Pharisiens et les scribes.

     La première chose à faire en écoutant cette parabole est de comparer l'image que nous avons de Dieu avec celle que Jésus nous donne de son Père. Le premier but de la Parabole est en effet de nous apprendre qui est Dieu. Et puis ne nous attardons pas à nous demander si nous sommes le fils prodigue ou bien l'aîné resté sagement à la maison. En réalité nous sommes l'un et l'autre, selon les circonstances.

     Plus d'une fois nous avons fait l'expérience de la miséricorde de Dieu lorsque nous sommes revenus à Lui après chacune de nos escapades. Mais ne nous est-il pas souvent arrivé de nous scandaliser de la façon dont Dieu accueille ceux que nous considérons les "pécheurs"?

     Considérons d'un peu plus près ce que cette parabole nous dit de chacun des deux fils. Le fils prodigue est un fils adulte, qui pour autant ne cesse jamais de considérer son père comme tel. Lorsqu'il veut partir il lui dit : "Père, donne-moi la part d'héritage qui me revient". Après être allé gaspiller son héritage dans un pays loin du Père, où il n'y avait ni justice ni bonté et après être devenu esclave dans un pays étranger, il décide de revenir chez son père. Même s'il ne se sent plus digne d'être appelé fils, il continue de dire "père" : " Père, j'ai péché contre le ciel et contre toi."

     Quant au fils aîné, il n'utilise à aucun moment le mot "père", il ne se considère même pas comme fils, mais comme un serviteur: "Il y a tant d'années que je suis à ton service sans jamais avoir désobéi à tes ordres". N'étant pas vraiment fils, il ne peut comprendre l'attitude d'un père. Pour lui, la seule réponse au péché est la punition, la seule réponse à la fuite est la négation d'une possibilité de retour.

     Même si l'humanité a toujours connu la violence, il semble que, de nos jours, elle soit entrée dans une course plus folle que jamais de réponse à la violence par une violence plus grande, sur la base de toutes sortes d'idéologies souvent religieuses. Seule la révélation du père de Jésus-Christ, prodigue en miséricorde, peut aider notre pauvre humanité à rompre ce cycle diabolique de la violence. Faisons-nous les messagers de cette révélation en l'incarnant dans nos vies de tous les jours.

7 March 2026 - Saturday of the 2nd week of Lent

Mi 7, 14-15.18-20; Lk 15,1-3. 11-32

Homily

Once again, Jesus finds Himself caught between two groups of people. On the one hand, there were the tax collectors and sinners who came to listen to Him and whose hearts were often touched by His attitude as much as by His words; on the other hand, there were the Pharisees and scribes, who did not approve of His attitude at all. They accused Him not only of welcoming unbelievers, but even of eating with them.


          The parable Jesus tells them has three main characters: "A man had two sons". The central character is not the minor son, the one we often call the prodigal son, although he is by no means a ‘child’. Rather, it is the father. The minor son, who asks for his share of the inheritance and then squanders it, represents the publicans and sinners who come to listen to Jesus, with whom He eats, and who are often converted by His contact. The eldest son, who refuses to share in the father's joy and to sit at table with his sinful brother, represents the Pharisees and scribes.

          The first thing to do when listening to this parable is to compare the image we have of God with the one Jesus gives us of his Father. The first aim of the parable is to teach us who God is. And let's not delay in asking ourselves whether we are the prodigal son or the eldest son who wisely stayed at home. In reality, we are both, depending on the circumstances.

          More than once we have experienced God's mercy when we returned to Him after each of our escapades. But haven't we often been scandalised by the way God welcomes those we consider to be "sinners"?

          Let's take a closer look at what this parable tells us about each of the two sons. The prodigal son is an adult son, but he never stops thinking of his father as such. When he wants to leave, he says to him: "Father, give me my share of the inheritance". After going to waste his inheritance in a country far from the Father, where there was neither justice nor goodness, and after becoming a slave in a foreign land, he decided to return to his father. Even though he no longer feels worthy to be called a son, he continues to say "father": "Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you."

          As for the eldest son, at no point does he use the word "father"; he doesn't even think of himself as a son, but as a servant: "I have served you for so many years without ever disobeying your orders." Since he was not really a son, he could not understand a father's attitude. For him, the only response to sin is punishment, the only response to flight is the denial of any possibility of return.

          Although mankind has always known violence, it seems that today it has entered into a madder-than-ever race to respond to violence with greater violence, based on all kinds of ideologies, often religious. Only the revelation of the Father of Jesus Christ, prodigal in mercy, can help our poor humanity to break this diabolical cycle of violence. Let us be the messengers of this revelation by incarnating it in our everyday lives.

6 mars 2026 – vendredi de la 2ème semaine de Carême

Gen 37, 3-4. 12-13. 17-28; Mat 21, 33-43. 45-46 

 

H O M É L I E

          Les deux lectures de cette messe parlent de violence. Dans celle de l'Ancien Testament, onze des douze Patriarches d'Israël commettent la violence contre leur frère. Dans sa parabole, Jésus parle des violences commises contre lui par les grands prêtres et les anciens du peuple. Dans les deux cas, Dieu a su tirer le salut du péché de l’homme.


          Jésus n'est pas intéressé à punir les auteurs de violence. Il s'intéresse simplement à ce que son Église porte des fruits. Quand, après avoir raconté la parabole, il pose la question : "Quand le maître de la vigne viendra, que fera-t-il à ces vignerons ? » Ses auditeurs répondent : "Ces misérables, il les fera périr misérablement. Il louera la vigne à d’autres vignerons qui lui en remettront le produit en temps voulu. » Dans sa réaction à leur réponse, Jésus ne retient que la deuxième partie de la réponse : « Il louera la vigne à d’autres vignerons qui lui en remettront le produit en temps voulu ». Jésus n'est pas intéressé par la punition et encore moins par la vengeance.

          Il n'est pas question ici que le Royaume soit enlevé aux Juifs, comme punition pour être donné aux païens, comme une lecture superficielle pourrait nous faire réfléchir. En fait, la Maison de Dieu est et demeure le peuple élu -- auquel s'ajoutent les nations. Cette parabole concerne vraiment les bergers ; et, bien sûr, il y a ici une sévère leçon pour quiconque exerce un ministère dans l'Église. Tout ministère est au service du Peuple et ne doit jamais être utilisé pour la satisfaction personnelle.

          Mais ce qui revient le plus souvent dans cette parabole, c'est la nécessité de porter des fruits. Il y a cinq mentions des fruits. Et cela doit être une préoccupation pour nous tous et pour chacun d'entre nous. Nous n'avons pas reçu le message de l'Evangile simplement pour notre satisfaction personnelle ou même pour notre salut personnel. Nous l'avons reçu pour porter des fruits - des fruits de justice et de droiture. Nous sommes tous ensemble l'Église ; et l'Église n'existe pas pour elle-même, mais pour le monde. Demandons-nous, dans notre cœur, si notre manière de vivre l'Évangile contribue réellement à l'établissement d'un monde où il y a moins de violence et plus de justice et d'amour.

Armand Veilleux

         

6 March 2026 - Friday of the 2nd week in Lent

Gen 37, 3-4. 12-13. 17-28; Mat 21, 33-43. 45-46

Homily

The two readings for this Mass speak of violence. In the Old Testament reading, eleven of the twelve patriarchs of Israel commit violence against their brothers. In the parable, Jesus speaks of the violence committed against Him by the chief priests and the elders of the people. In both cases, God was able to draw salvation from man's sin.


            Jesus is not interested in punishing the perpetrators of violence. He is simply interested in seeing His Church bear fruit. When, after telling the parable, He asks the question: 'When the master of the vineyard comes, what will He do to these vinedressers? His listeners replied: "Those wretches, He will make them perish miserably. He will rent out the vineyard to other vinedressers who will give him the produce in due course." In his reaction to their reply, Jesus retained only the second part of the answer: “He will rent out the vineyard to other vinedressers who will give Him the produce in due course”. Jesus is not interested in punishment and even less in revenge.

            There is no question here of the Kingdom being taken from the Jews as a punishment to be given to the Gentiles, as a superficial reading might lead us to believe. In fact, the House of God is and remains the chosen people -- to whom the nations have been added. This parable is really about shepherds; and, of course, there is a stern lesson here for anyone who exercises a ministry in the Church. All ministry is at the service of the people and must never be used for personal gratification.

            But what comes up most often in this parable is the need to bear fruit. There are five references to fruit. And this must be a concern for each and every one of us. We did not receive the Gospel message simply for our personal satisfaction or even for our personal salvation. We received it to bear fruit - fruit of justice and righteousness. We are all Church together; and the Church does not exist for itself, but for the world. Let us ask ourselves, in our hearts, if our way of living the Gospel is really contributing to the establishment of a world where there is less violence and more justice and love.

Armand Veilleux

6 March 2026 - Friday of the 2nd week in Lent

Gen 37, 3-4. 12-13. 17-28; Mat 21, 33-43. 45-46

Homily

The two readings for this Mass speak of violence. In the Old Testament reading, eleven of the twelve patriarchs of Israel commit violence against their brothers. In the parable, Jesus speaks of the violence committed against Him by the chief priests and the elders of the people. In both cases, God was able to draw salvation from man's sin.


            Jesus is not interested in punishing the perpetrators of violence. He is simply interested in seeing His Church bear fruit. When, after telling the parable, He asks the question: 'When the master of the vineyard comes, what will He do to these vinedressers? His listeners replied: "Those wretches, He will make them perish miserably. He will rent out the vineyard to other vinedressers who will give him the produce in due course." In his reaction to their reply, Jesus retained only the second part of the answer: “He will rent out the vineyard to other vinedressers who will give Him the produce in due course”. Jesus is not interested in punishment and even less in revenge.

            There is no question here of the Kingdom being taken from the Jews as a punishment to be given to the Gentiles, as a superficial reading might lead us to believe. In fact, the House of God is and remains the chosen people -- to whom the nations have been added. This parable is really about shepherds; and, of course, there is a stern lesson here for anyone who exercises a ministry in the Church. All ministry is at the service of the people and must never be used for personal gratification.

            But what comes up most often in this parable is the need to bear fruit. There are five references to fruit. And this must be a concern for each and every one of us. We did not receive the Gospel message simply for our personal satisfaction or even for our personal salvation. We received it to bear fruit - fruit of justice and righteousness. We are all Church together; and the Church does not exist for itself, but for the world. Let us ask ourselves, in our hearts, if our way of living the Gospel is really contributing to the establishment of a world where there is less violence and more justice and love.

Armand Veilleux

4 March 2026 – Wednesday of the Second Week of Lent

Jeremiah 18:18-20; Matthew 20:17-28

Homily

We are barely halfway through the second week of Lent, and already the shadow of the cross, but also the light of the resurrection, are looming on the horizon. Jesus begins his long journey to Jerusalem, which will lead Him to Calvary, and He starts to prepare the Twelve for these tragic events, but they do not understand. They expect that, in one way or another, Jesus will establish an earthly kingdom, and each one thinks about the place he will have in this new political universe. The two sons of Zebedee call on their ‘mother’ to obtain good positions in Jesus' government. Jesus takes this opportunity to give everyone, once again, a lesson on the meaning of authority conceived as service and not as power.

5 March 2026 – Thursday of the 2nd week of Lent

Jeremiah 17:5-10; Luke 16:19-31

Homily

An important aspect of the story we have just heard – and this is the case with almost all of Jesus‘ parables – is that we are simply confronted with the facts, and that we – like Jesus’ immediate listeners – must draw lessons and rules for living from these facts themselves. The Gospel gives us the raw facts and leaves it up to each of us to draw conclusions for our own lives, and all of us together, for our society.